About the Author
More By Djehuti
Global Plantation: Neo-Confederate Control from Gaza to American Gulags
|
Economic Warfare: The Tariff Theater
Trump's tariff war with China has collapsed under its own contradictions. After raising barriers to 145%, Beijing responded with a 125% counter-tariff—effectively ending the charade by declaring American goods "no longer viable[1]" in Chinese markets. This isn't merely trade policy; it's plantation style coercion failing against a nation that has now forged its own economic whip to protect itself.
Like the Confederacy's cotton embargo of 1861, today's tariff theater imagines a US that can dictate terms to nations it no longer dominates. China's $3.58 trillion export market renders U.S. retaliation symbolic at best—while potentially having devastating effects on Black folks at home. The 5.97% collapse in the S&P 500 primarily affects white wealth-holders (61% of whom own stocks versus just 12% of Black Americans), but the real pain comes through inflated prices on essential goods. When tariffs drive up costs for electronics, clothing, and household items, Black households spending 40% more of their income on basic necessities feel the squeeze first.
More insidiously, these tariffs strangle Black entrepreneurship by cutting off access to affordable manufacturing. The small Black business renaissance in e-commerce, beauty products, and apparel has relied heavily on Chinese production networks—now priced out of reach by neo-confederate economic nationalism. What Black America must recognize in China's response: economic self-determination requires building our own proverbial whips—independent supply chains, cooperative manufacturing, and capital networks beyond plantation oversight.
Trump's Offshore Gulag Threat
.jpg)
"I would be honored to give them," declared Trump[2], responding to El Salvador's offer to imprison American "criminals" in its mega-prison. The dog whistle became a foghorn when he specified targets: those who "push people into subways" and "hit people over the head"—coded references to Black urban crime that echo 19th century anti-Black laws used to america's insatiable appetite for free labor.
The playbook remains unchanged, it's outsourced convict leasing with 21st century flare. From Angola Prison's cotton fields to El Salvador's CECOT prison concrete cells, the logic remains: extract folks from communities, place them under foreign control, and profit from their removal. And if we can sweep up a disproportionate number of Black people, well thats all gravy.
When Trump says "horrible criminals," his base hears "Black men." When he references "20-time wise guys," they envision the same "super-predators" Hillary Clinton demonized in 1996. The material reality behind his "American-grown criminals" rhetoric: 75% of those already deported to El Salvador had no criminal record—mirroring how Black Codes manufactured "criminals" after Emancipation.
Elon's Gaming Humiliation
Elon Musk, currenly neo-confederacy's chief propagandist, exposed his fragility when gamers mercilessly mocked him during a livestream. After dying repeatedly to a tutorial boss[3] in Path of Exile 2...or was it Diablo, the world's richest man responded with a slur against the intellectually disabled before rage-quitting after 30 minutes.
Like his ancestors, who created elaborate fantasies about their own superiority, Musk had previously paid skilled gamers to build characters that made him appear competent—a perfect metaphor for the richess of the USA. White wealth built on Black labor while claiming self-made success. His unraveling on camera reveals that just like his ancestors, his perceived gravitas is scaffolded by a few flimsy sticks, liable to fall over with the slightest nudge (lets keep bullying him)
Behind this digital minstrelsy lies material consequence: Musk's "Department of Government Efficiency" dismantles civil rights infrastructure while his SpaceX contracts extract billions of dollars from the public. His gaming humiliation matters only because it momentarily pierces the myth of white tech genius that shields this neo-confederate wealth extraction.
Self-Defense Criminalized: Karmelo Anthony's Stand
A Black teen track athlete faces murder charges after allegedly stabbing fellow student Austin Metcalf who, witnesses say, physically confronted him after demanding he leave a tent. His GiveSendGo fundraiser has surpassed $350,000—with donors explicitly comparing his case to Emmett Till and Kyle Rittenhouse.
This isn't new—it's self-defense while Black. From Nat Turner to the Deacons for Defense to Assata Shakur, America has criminalized Black self defense. Anthony's case reveals the double standard: Rittenhouse was celebrated for shooting protesters, while Anthony faces a $1 million bond for allegedly defending himself against a single aggressor.
The liberal establishment's silence proves Malcolm X's observation: "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." Meanwhile, Black folks recognize the pattern and mobilize resources—just as they did for the Scottsboro Boys in 1931.
Digital Freedom Papers: Antisemitism Screening for Citizenship
The Department of Homeland Security now screens immigrants' social media for "antisemitic activity"—a transparent pretext to exclude pro-Palestinian voices. The policy targets "aliens applying for lawful permanent resident status, foreign students and aliens affiliated with educational institutions linked to antisemitic activity."
Like the slave passes that restricted Black movement before Emancipation, these digital restrictions create a tiered citizenship where political speech determines human rights. The historical continuity is unmistakable: from Black Codes that criminalized "seditious speech" to COINTELPRO's targeting of radicals to today's surveillance of immigrant politics.
DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin's statement that immigrants cannot "hide behind the First Amendment" confirms what Black America has always known: constitutional protections were never universal. Meanwhile, actual neo-Nazi organizations remain unlisted in the ban—just as the Klan operated with impunity while Black organizations faced state destruction.
Israel's Divine Right to Starve Palestinians
Israel's High Court just legitimized starvation as state policy, rejecting a petition challenging restrictions on humanitarian aid to Gaza—even as the International Court of Justice explicitly ordered Israel to "ensure unfettered provision of humanitarian relief." More telling was Judge David Mintz's separate opinion citing the biblical commandment to "blot out the memory of Amalek" as grounds for rejecting distinctions between civilians and combatants[4].
History doesn't always repeat. Sometimes it rhymes. Israel's judgements are judicial genocide recycled for a new generation. Like the 1823 Johnson v. M'Intosh ruling that justified Native dispossession through "Christian discovery," or the 1857 Dred Scott decision declaring Black people "beings of an inferior order," Israel's court provides theological cover for mass suffering. The pattern is identical: invoke religious text, deny full humanity to the targeted group, and wrap extermination in legal language.
America's judicial theology of oppression birthed both Nazi race law and Israeli apartheid. When Mississippi Judge Tom Brady defended segregation in 1954 by claiming "God created a different species," he echoed the same biblical distortions now employed in Tel Aviv. The material reality remains: courts transform religious texts into extermination licenses—whether for Black Americans, Native peoples, or Palestinians.
.jpg)
Behind the court's dismissal of "positive obligations" to ensure aid lies the oldest colonial logic: the obligation to exterminate "uncivilized" peoples. When the court ruled that Hamas hadn't been "defeated as a political organization," it established an impossible condition for civilian survival—just as U.S. courts required Native nations to be "civilized" before receiving protection under law.
What Palestinians understand: America's judicial blueprint for genocide has been exported, refined, and redeployed by its proteges. From Chief Justice Taney's Bible-based denial of Black humanity to Judge Mintz's invocation of Amalek, the sacred text remains the same: the colonizer's right to kill with God's blessing.
The Neo-Confederate Logic
This week exposes four constants in America's racial order and its global projections:
- Scripture sanctifies violence. From American slaveholders quoting Ephesians to Israeli judges invoking Amalek, religious text becomes the first weapon of racial control—a pattern unbroken since Plymouth Rock.
- Courts codify oppression. Legal systems—whether approving El Salvador gulags or Palestinian starvation—transform cruelty into procedure, just as they did for Black enslavement and Native land theft.
- Self-defense remains criminalized. The vitriol directed at Karmelo Anthony mirrors the condemnation of Gaza resistance—both revealing zero tolerance for the oppressed who dare protect themselves against state and societal violence.
- Material control supersedes symbolic posturing. From tariff wars to humanitarian blockades, the neo-confederate project targets resources first, knowing bodies follow where bread leads.
"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress."
The plantation model has gone global, with America's proteges—from Israel to El Salvador—refining its techniques. Yet as China's economic independence and Black community's support for Karmelo demonstrate, extraction economies eventually collapse under their contradictions. Biblical apartheid, like its secular counterparts, cannot withstand organized resistance. The question isn't if these systems will fall, but when, and what we build in their place when they do.
- ↑ https://www.npr.org/2025/04/11/nx-s1-5361056/china-us-trade-war-tariffs-escalation
- ↑ https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5235937-trump-el-salvador-prison-deportation/
- ↑ https://x.com/DevinDtv/status/1908649812997836856
- ↑ https://www.justsecurity.org/109731/israel-court-rejects-gaza-aid-petition/
Comments welcome below! No login required to join the discussion. Share your thoughts, experiences, and perspectives on these ongoing struggles.